Pacifism is Good Medicine for Gun Violence

Earlier this year, I answered a question in an interview by saying, “The United States of America is the one advanced nation on Earth in which we do not have sufficient common-sense gun-safety laws — even in the face of repeated mass killings.” And later that day, there was a mass shooting at a movie theater in Lafayette, Louisiana. That day! Somehow this has become routine. The reporting is routine. My response here at this podium ends up being routine. The conversation in the aftermath of it. We’ve become numb to this.
Barack Obama, October 2015

I recently generated some unintentional hilarity at a dinner table when I said that pacifism was the key to reducing gun violence. “So,” a friend said, “you’re not only gonna get us world peace in five years. You’re gonna get us gun control too.”

Well … maybe so, though I won’t do it alone.

Many of us are in despair about the rash of gun shootings in the United States of America. We’re stunned and furious about our NRA-funded Congress’s inability to pass gun control laws. Even President Obama seems to be resigned to short-term failure, since Congress is nowhere even close to passing serious gun control laws, and instead wastes its time blocking small measures like closing the gun show loophole.

The stakes are painfully high when we talk about gun violence: images of dead children on one side, rhetoric about the bloody tree of liberty on the other. Because the stakes are so high, our debates about gun control and gun violence tend to be harsh, shrill and unforgiving. That describes the state of the debate today: loud, shrill, painful but yet ineffective and without hope.

Since our nation is deadlocked on this terrible problem, it won’t hurt to take a step back from the screaming battle lines and try to think more broadly about why we’re stuck. The philosophy of pacifism has much insight to offer with regard to this major problem, and can be good medicine for gun violence for at least three reasons:

1. There Cannot Be Peace At Home In A World At War

If you talk to an NRA supporter about why guns must never be banned, it probably won’t take long before the NRA supporter reveals the motivation we all know and understand: many Americans believe their country to be at imminent threat of foreign invasion, abetted by internal enemies who are already scheming to end America’s tradition of individual freedom. The guns are a stockpile against this future threat, as well as a symbol of determined resistance.

This vision may seem paranoid to critics of the NRA … however, this paranoia is stoked by the horrific realities of violence, dictatorship and totalitarian exploitation that exists today around the world, and therefore cannot be easily dismissed.

The United States of America cannot exist as a fortress of peaceful domesticity in North America while wars rage in Asia, Africa and the Middle East. As long as war is the primary fact of life outside our nation’s boundaries, guns will continue to be very popular in our homes. That’s not to say that ending the epidemic of violent wars around the world (if such a thing could happen) would immediately solve the epidemic of gun violence at home. But the obverse seems to be self-evident: as long as violent wars are going on around the world, it will be that much harder to reduce the domestic paranoia that keeps the NRA in business.

The connection between global war and domestic gun violence can also be seen in the life stories and profiles of the sick individuals who commit acts of mass violence such as school shootings. These sick individuals show a variety of interests: sometimes they’re obsessed with Batman, or with dogs, or with video games. But mass shooters have one disturbing characteristic: they tend to relate heavily to military themes, and are often obsessive guerrophiles.

2. Gun Control Advocates Must Treat Their Opponents With Respect

The great nonviolent campaigns of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King were exceptional for always treating opponents with dignity and respect. Too often, those of us who support greater gun control laws today make the mistake of ridiculing and minimizing our opponents.We would do well to follow the examples of Gandhi and King and begin taking a higher road in the gun control debate.

This may be easier said than done, especially in some of the East/West coastal cities where insulting “dumb rednecks” is commonplace. (Sorry, but it is, and this needs to stop.) Gun control activists need to remember that NRA supporters are not stupid, are not uneducated, are not small-minded.

I have the privilege of knowing many different people who are passionate gun-owners, and have learned that there are many different reasons, some entirely valid, for their interest in guns. The tradition of pacifism reminds us that we should try to always avoid the mistake of categorizing, stereotyping or insulting those we disagree with. We need to take on the NRA directly, but we must do this from a position of dignity, empathy and respect.

3. We Can’t Get Rid of the Little Guns Without Getting Rid of the Big Guns

It’s no coincidence that the United States of America has the worst gun violence in the world, and also spends more money than any other country on weapons and soldiers.

We mentioned the “gun show loophole” above. But the photo at the top of this page doesn’t show some neighborhood gun show in some Missouri hockey rink. It’s the annual AUSA Conference in Washington DC: the biggest gun show of all, where USA military personnel gather to talk and drink and admire shiny new weapons.

The AUSA is about a hundred times bigger than any neighborhood gun show, and those shiny new weapons are paid for by taxpayers. That’s some gun show loophole.

Why don’t gun control activists protest this massive conference, which takes place in Washington DC next week?

* * * * *

Dear Friends: We are beginning our Indiegogo drive for, a new non-profit organization and website. We need to raise $10,000 and are 25% there. Please donate today.

3 Responses

  1. “pacifism was the key to
    “pacifism was the key to reducing gun violence”


    Gun control is unconstitutional and would not alleviate the problem.

    It is already illegal to murder, but that doesn’t stop the murderers.

    You state the solution in your first paragraph, yet then go on to ignore your own solution and advocate the exact opposite of pacifism to address the problem.

  2. TKG, there is plenty of
    TKG, there is plenty of reason to believe gun control WOULD solve the problem of psychotic individuals, often teenagers or young adults, getting easy access to powerful automatic weapons and shooting up malls or movie theaters or high schools or colleges. Do you not see the cause and effect here? These shootings rarely happen in countries other than the USA.

  3. Hi Levi,
    Hi Levi,

    I do not agree with your assertion, but that is not what I am addressing.

    I am saying gun control is not pacifist.

    I am saying adherence to pacifism would decrease murders.

    I agree the people who do these school shootings and others seem to be mentally disturbed.

    It brings up the question, can these people understand the basics of pacifism? That it is wrong to murder people?

    How far gone do people need to be to go on a rampage?

    And, what about the vast majority of murders that are not even news? Are all of them psychotic in the manner these school shooters or movie theater shooter seem?

    I’d say not. And I’d say that in most cases, all of them know or can know what they are doing is wrong.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What we're up to ...

Litkicks is 26 years old! This website has been on a long and wonderful journey since 1994. We’re relaunching the whole site on a new platform in June 2021, and will have more updates soon. We’ve also been busy producing a couple of podcasts – please check them out.

World BEYOND War: A New Podcast
Lost Music: Exploring Literary Opera

Explore related articles ...